Most readers of this magazine will agree that God could have created the world in a split second or could have created it in mil­lions of years, if he so chose. How long did he take?

This article will simply set forth a brief case for why this writer under­stands the days of Genesis one to be depicted in the Bible as real and ordinary days in terms of their length, though they be extraordinary because of what happened on them. It will then briefly note some of the dynamics of the context of the discus­sion.

Have you ever tried to imagine what a world without grasses would look like? The scenery might well look pretty bleak, with extensive patches of bare soil. We see good examples of this in illustrations of di­nosaurs in their natural surroundings ­scientists have long declared that there were no grasses present in dinosaur com­munities. The plant-eating dinosaurs had to make do, we have been assured, with cy­cads, ferns, horsetails and trees of flowering plants such as palms and magnolias.

The world is full of apologists for all sorts of points of view. Among academics today there are humanists, atheists, agnos­tics, and even some who are officially Christian, Jewish, Muslim or adherents of any one of a vast array of Eastern religions. Nev­ertheless most scientists ignore any religious implications for their disciplines. There are, of course, exceptions, some of them well known. The stories of why these people made the choices that they did, are often very interesting.

If evolution were a real process, there should be few useless features in an or­ganism. The idea that the genome consti­tutes a warehouse of useless features waiting for a useful application, is directly contrary to evolution theory. Of course the results of this study present no problems for the creation model.

Since the advent of global positioning satellites, or at least since their availability for civilians, scientists have found many uses for these devices. One of the more in­teresting applications is to track animals. Of obvious popular appeal are programs such as "fish with chips." Scientists have been astonished to dis­cover how far these and many other ani­mals migrate. This article explores some examples.

This year we celebrate the 300th anniversary of the birth of Carl Linnaeus, and next year we celebrate the 250th anniversary of his ground breaking system for naming and catego­rizing plants and animals. Prior to the time of Linnaeus, natu­ralists had a terrible time dealing with the creation's incredible biodiversity (variety of organisms). They even had prob­lems trying to discover what name, if any, had been applied to a given organ­ism. Linnaeus developed a system that eliminated the chaos. To this day, we have enjoyed the results of his efforts.

A popular rendition of events has or­ganisms on the famous Galapagos Islands inspiring Darwin to develop his evolution­ary ideas. But do the organisms on this archipelago actually lead us to the idea of common descent from a primitive ances­tor? According to Dr. Todd Wood of Bryan College, Dayton, Tennessee, the answer is actually no.

Nestled on the southern shore of the Gaspe Peninsula on the northern shore of the Bay of Chaleur, sits a world class museum about which most Cana­dians are entirely ignorant. The museum is in a small provincial park consisting of land overlooking the bay, fossil bearing cliffs and the beach below. Purchased by the Quebec government in the 1970s to protect a spectacular assemblage of fossil fishes, the land was designated a provin­cial park (Parc national de Miguasha) in 1985. A few years later this park was also designated a UNESCO World Her­itage Site.

This article argues that in line with the biblical teaching, creation should be regarded as the work of God the Father. It explains what it means to call God the Father. Looking at his work of creation, it deals with the meaning of "out of nothing," the duration of creation, and the creation of things visible and invisible. The claims of evolution and theistic evolution are evaluated.

This article looks at how the theory of evolution has impacted the belief of Christians on creation, with due consideration to the gap theory, day-age theory, theistic evolution, and the framework hypothesis.

Examining the hypothesis of evolution, this article looks at the link between micro evolution and macro evolution, showing that macro evolution is not based on science but belief, and that it undermines biblical authority.

Looking at the faith of the centurion as recorded in Matthew 8:5-13 and Luke 7:1-10, this article demonstrates how this story can help one believe that God created through the Word, and that Christians have to demonstrate the same faith in the power of God's Word, and deny theistic evolution.

This article looks at the theory of evolution in light of Genesis. It looks at Genesis 1 as revelation, history, and God's way of justifying himself against evil, and thereby shows that evolution has no room, but creation by God does.

Does Genesis 1 record true history? This article looks at Genesis 1 from the perspective of different theories which deny its historicity. The author critiques these theories, maintaining that Genesis 1 does record true history.

This article shows that evolution and the biblical truth of creation cannot live together. Accepting evolution means denying scripture. The author demonstrates this by looking at the theory around the beginning of Adam.

This article outlines the historical effect of Darwinism and the theory of evolution on the church and society in general.

This article is about evolution and Adam as the first human.

This article is about evolution.

This article looks at the reasons for a young earth and the objections against it.

Is evolution really based on science?

This article is about evolution and what they believe about God. The autonomy and authority of man is also discussed.

This article evaluates the day-age theory as supported by theistic evolution and progressive creationism, and its interpretation of Genesis 1 and Genesis 2.  The author shows why these chapters must be understood as a real historical account.

What is man? Atheism based on evolution has its answers. This article evaluates the consequences of the answer from an evolutionistic worldview. It shows that only the biblical account of man being created in God’s image is what makes sense to the reality of man’s identity, value of man and purpose of man. 

Is evolution a scientific claim? Do fossils prove that evolution is right? This article examines the rules of science and applies them to the claims of evolution. Do they nullify the creation story?

Ideas have consequences. This article shows how the theory of evolution influenced Hitler and in turn gave to the rise of racism.

The existence of fossils supports the biblical account of history as recorded in Genesis. Therefore, as this article indicates, fossils do not prove evolution.

Ideas have consequences. What are the consequences of the theory of evolution? This article shows that to embrace evolution is to embrace death, since life according to it is a cruel place created by the impersonal process of chance.

Why is it that the Bible does not give a definition of God? This article shows that through creation man was created with a sense of God, and God has revealed what he is like. Hence atheism and evolution leave man guilty before God.

The theory of evolution offers a meaningless, purposeless, and hopeless life. It is only in the story of creation that man can find meaning and purpose.

This article is a reflection on the theory of evolution propagated by Charles Darwin. It looks at its scientific base and the impact it had on the world and the church.

This article shows that the theory of evolution undermines the authority of scripture, the doctrine of redemption, and the truth of the coming of the new heaven and earth.

This article shows that creation is central to biblical authority and the Christian life. This article also shows that both evolution and theistic evolution are contrary to Scripture.

This article shows that theistic evolution denies the literal reading of Genesis, and is therefore also a denial of Adam, original sin and salvation in Christ.

This article is about fossils, evidence and scientific deductions. 

Is it true that nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution? 

What is truly scientific, and on what basis do we believe something? This article looks at the origin of this world - the Big-Bang theory and evolution in contrast with the creation account.

This article is about the scientific claims of the evolution theory.

This article on man's creation in the image of God, also focuses on evolution's image of man and theistic evolution's image of man.

This article looks at the day-age theory of creation, and death in paradise.

Is it important to believe in Adam's existence in paradise? This article looks at the First Adam and the Second Adam according to Scripture, and what this means for the belief in evolution.

How have Christians responded to Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species? This article presents various responses since the book first appeared, and also shows how theistic evolution got a foothold among Christians.

This article uses the commentary of various scientists who have questioned evolution to show that Darwinism has no scientific ground.

Evolution is not science but a philosophy based on naturalism. This article examines the icons used to teach evolution, showing how deceiving they are.

This article shows that evolution remains a theory without scientific proof.

The common denominator between evolution and the philosophy of Nietzsche is that they both deny God. This article describes how this theme of denying God displays itself in music, liturature, and art.

Are peppered moths a good example of organic evolution? 

Did the amphibians evolve from fish? This article looks at the theory of the evolution of certain water species. 

This article is about the Roman Catholic Church and evolution.

Did humans and chimpanzees descend from a common ancestor? This article considers certain scientific research that suggests this is so, and shows that while there are certain similarities in the chromosomes of each, there are big differences that cannot be accounted for. Ultimately the study of various gnomes has revealed how complicated everything is and how little we understand.

This article shows that, contrary to the claims of evolution, chemistry and the anthropic principle point to intelligent design of the universe.

This article looks at the possibility of evolution in birds.

Theistic evolution is the idea that God used a random process of chance to create the world. This article shows that such a view is inconsistent with the biblical message of creation, fall, and redemption.

This article is about the mystery of intelligence, language, the genetic code and Intelligent Design in contrast with Darwin's theory of evolution.

This article is about evolution and the classification system of plants.

Scientific racism is a direct result of embracing Darwinism and evolution. Looking at the history of the Aborigines, this article shows how scientific racism happened.