Do the Gospels give contradictory accounts of Jesus' life? Is Paul's teaching different from that of Christ? These questions arise from misconceptions about the New Testament. This article addresses six such misconceptions.
Need a quick summary of any or all of the books of the New Testament? See what this article has to offer.
This article provides a historical survey of the Greek New Testament, looking at both early and modern attempts to standardize the text.
This is a survey of the state of New Testament studies. Aspects noted include textual criticism, redaction criticism, and the divinity of Jesus and his resurrection.
In the Introduction Kruger explains what the biblical-theological approach to the New Testament entails.
In this article, Yarbrough reviews William Baird's volume History of New Testament Research, </em>volume two:<em> From Jonathan Edwards to Rudolf Bultmann.
People love conspiracies. They love it even more when it involves politics, noteworthy people, or such institutions as Christianity. After all, isn't it exciting to think that there is some sinister plot that lurks behind what we don’t know, or perhaps, don’t want to accept? It is in this context that so many people have latched on to The Da Vinci Code, a novel by Dan Brown. People use it as a vehicle to express their doubts.
Some biblical scholars believe that the four Gospels were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. According to this view, the traditional authorship was assigned or guessed at by the early church. This suggestion is put forward, casting doubt on the traditional authors, without much examination of its own merits. This article argues that the evidence for this position is limited. The belief that there originally was anonymity of authorship of the Gospels is unlikely.
