The Gospel of Matthew's account of the resurrection of Jesus is regarded by many scholars as the least reliable historically. This article does not provide definitive answers to the questions raised, but it indicates some of the avenues that could be further explored. The relationship of Matthew 28 to the other gospels is examined. The major arguments that supposedly justify treating Matthew 28 with suspicion are each considered in turn.

The author finds it regrettable that one can say, "I do not believe in doctrine; I believe in Jesus only." The author refutes this by referring to Scripture, especially the epistles of Paul, as well as the Lord Jesus' Great Commission to the disciples and the church in Matthew 28:19-20.

This article contains a framework for a sermon on Matthew 28:16-20, the Great Commission.

What is redaction criticism? Osborne argues that it is a very positive tool for biblical interpretation. The aim of this article is to apply redaction criticism to the Great Commission in Matthew 28:16-20, to work towards a better understanding of the passage. Osborne then wants to apply it for a better understanding of inerrancy.

Culver reflects on a number of exegetical matters in Matthew 28:16-20. For example, he wants to ascertain to whom the promise was given, and what is meant by "all power."

The article discusses the building of the church of Christ, with consideration of relevant passages like Matthew 16:13-20 and Matthew 28.

This article is a Bible study on Matthew 28:1-20.