Jump to navigation

Home

Christian Library

Main menu

  • Browse
  • Log in
  • OTP

Search

Subscribe to RSS - subjunctive

subjunctive

Not Only That ("Ou Monon"), But It Has Been Said Before: A Response to Verlyn Verbrugge or Why Reading Previous Scholarship Can Avoid Scholarly Misunderstandings

  • Technical
  • Stanley E. Porter

This article considers the use of the use of "ou monon" in Romans 5:3. Porter reviews comments made by previous commentators on this text. He wants to reaffirm that the subjunctive reading is correct in Romans 5:1, independent from any conclusions one reaches about Romans 5:2-3.

  • Read more about Not Only That ("Ou Monon"), But It Has Been Said Before: A Response to Verlyn Verbrugge or Why Reading Previous Scholarship Can Avoid Scholarly Misunderstandings
  • Share
  • Add new comment

Romans 5:1: The Grammatical Internal Evidence for "Exomen"

  • Technical
  • Verlyn D. Verbrugge

Should the text in Romans 5:1 be read as an indicative or a subjunctive, that is, "ἔχομεν" or "ἔχωμεν"? Verbrugge wants to consider all the grammatical internal evidence to support the best text-critical decisions for this text.

  • Read more about Romans 5:1: The Grammatical Internal Evidence for "Exomen"
  • Share
  • Add new comment

Left sidebar

Library

Loading ...
Man knows mighty little, and may someday learn enough of his own ignorance to fall down and pray. H. Adams
  • Share