Jump to navigation

Home

Christian Library

Main menu

  • Browse
  • Log in
  • OTP

Search

Subscribe to RSS - subjunctive

subjunctive

Not Only That ("Ou Monon"), But It Has Been Said Before: A Response to Verlyn Verbrugge or Why Reading Previous Scholarship Can Avoid Scholarly Misunderstandings

  • Technical
  • Stanley E. Porter

This article considers the use of the use of "ou monon" in Romans 5:3. Porter reviews comments made by previous commentators on this text. He wants to reaffirm that the subjunctive reading is correct in Romans 5:1, independent from any conclusions one reaches about Romans 5:2-3.

  • Read more about Not Only That ("Ou Monon"), But It Has Been Said Before: A Response to Verlyn Verbrugge or Why Reading Previous Scholarship Can Avoid Scholarly Misunderstandings
  • Share
  • Add new comment

Romans 5:1: The Grammatical Internal Evidence for "Exomen"

  • Technical
  • Verlyn D. Verbrugge

Should the text in Romans 5:1 be read as an indicative or a subjunctive, that is, "ἔχομεν" or "ἔχωμεν"? Verbrugge wants to consider all the grammatical internal evidence to support the best text-critical decisions for this text.

  • Read more about Romans 5:1: The Grammatical Internal Evidence for "Exomen"
  • Share
  • Add new comment

Left sidebar

Library

Loading ...
It is the nature of faith to believe God upon His bare word… It will not be, says sense. It cannot be, says reason. It both can and will be, says faith, for I have a promise. John Trapp
  • Share