Jump to navigation

Home

Christian Library

Main menu

  • Browse
  • Log in
  • OTP

Search

You are here

  1. Library > 
  2. Doctrine … faith (What we believe) > 
  3. Last things (Future) > 
  4. New Heaven and New Earth & Hell

Fallacies in the Annihilationism Debate: A Critique of Robert Peterson and Other Traditionalist Scholarship

Fallacies in the Annihilationism Debate: A Critique of Robert Peterson and Other Traditionalist Scholarship

  • Semi-Technical
  • Glenn Peoples

This article presents a critique of Robert Peterson who defends the traditional interpretation of eternal torment against the challenge posed by annihilationism. The author critically examines key features of Peterson’s case and suggest that it has some major shortcomings and is ultimately unsuccessful. Annihilationists admit that the Bible teaches eternal punishment. They differ with the more traditional view of what this punishment entails. Is it eternal torment or is it eternal literal destruction? Texts reflected upon include Matthew 10:28, 1 Corinthians 3:17, Philippians 1:28, 2 Thessalonians 1:9, and 2 Peter 3:7.

Source: Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 2007. 19 pages.

Read article
  • Share

Add new comment

(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Right sidebar

Featured content

Loading ...

Left sidebar

Library

Loading ...
When we take God for our God, we take his people for our people Matthew Henry
  • Share