Jump to navigation

Home

Christian Library

Main menu

  • Browse
  • Log in
  • OTP

Search

You are here

  1. Library > 
  2. Interpretation & Hermeneutics > 
  3. Interpretation (General)

A Critique of Certain Uncritical Assumptions in Modern Historiography

A Critique of Certain Uncritical Assumptions in Modern Historiography

  • Semi-Technical
  • John W. Montgomery

Montgomery interacts with the view that biblical documents for the most part are not firsthand eyewitness accounts of the events they describe, but merely the product of faith reactions of editors and redactors of literature. He contends that miracles can be taken with historical seriousness by the historian, and that the historical-critical method of dismembering biblical texts is not a reflection of good historical scholarship.

Source: Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 1997. 9 pages.

Read article
  • Share

Add new comment

(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Right sidebar

Featured content

Left sidebar

Library

According to the degree of our faith will be our enjoyment of Christ’s salvation, our patience in the day of trial, our victory over the world. Unbelief, in short, is the true cause of a thousand spiritual diseases. J. C. Ryle
  • Share